Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:21

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Can This Blue Chemical Really Boost Your Brain? Here's What We Know. - ScienceAlert
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What types of cushioning does Nike use in their running shoes?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
The #1 Spice to Help You Poop, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Early AI investor Elad Gil finds his next big bet: AI-powered rollups - TechCrunch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
FDA Gives Tomato Recall Over Salmonella Highest Risk Warning - TODAY.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Upcoming Telescope Predicted to Discover Millions of Hidden Solar System Objects - Gizmodo